<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sometimes Orange Juice is Just Orange Juice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.iloveflycasual.com/index.php/2009/03/sometimes-orange-juice-is-just-orange-juice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.iloveflycasual.com/index.php/2009/03/sometimes-orange-juice-is-just-orange-juice/</link>
	<description>Articles on web design, music, and pop culture as told by FlyCasual (Jason Caldeira and Gregory McClendon).</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 04:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Caldeira</title>
		<link>http://blog.iloveflycasual.com/index.php/2009/03/sometimes-orange-juice-is-just-orange-juice/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Caldeira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iloveflycasual.com/?p=51#comment-11</guid>
		<description>For me the argument is less about whether or not the redesign is effective (or necessary), and more about the designer's intention. There are many, many re-brands that are effective regardless of the iconic status of the original brand. Tropicana is no exception. Hell... the orange with the straw in it is a relatively recent addition to their packaging based on a successful tv ad campaign several years back. (Link: http://www.freedigitalphotos.net/image/s_tropicana-orange-juice.jpg) The current packaging isn't so strong that there's no room to move in a new direction. This design team just got hung up in all the wrong details, like the tactile quality of the orange cap, for example. That's the wrong focus - they lost site of the big picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me the argument is less about whether or not the redesign is effective (or necessary), and more about the designer&#8217;s intention. There are many, many re-brands that are effective regardless of the iconic status of the original brand. Tropicana is no exception. Hell&#8230; the orange with the straw in it is a relatively recent addition to their packaging based on a successful tv ad campaign several years back. (Link: <a href="http://www.freedigitalphotos.net/image/s_tropicana-orange-juice.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.freedigitalphotos.net/image/s_tropicana-orange-juice.jpg</a>) The current packaging isn&#8217;t so strong that there&#8217;s no room to move in a new direction. This design team just got hung up in all the wrong details, like the tactile quality of the orange cap, for example. That&#8217;s the wrong focus - they lost site of the big picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory McClendon</title>
		<link>http://blog.iloveflycasual.com/index.php/2009/03/sometimes-orange-juice-is-just-orange-juice/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory McClendon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 23:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.iloveflycasual.com/?p=51#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Maybe it is over-thinking.... but maybe it's just an attempt to change imagery that was so strong to begin with. Or perhaps in the case of Tropicana, imagery that everyone was so accustom to. I think people would have rejected change in this case regardless of how good it was, or was not. Reminds me of when Coca-Cola tried to mess around with its logo several times...even calling it just "Coke", instead of Cola-Cola. I believe the new branding was scrapped just b/c the old one was so strong. Now the "Coca-cola" classic logo is embedded into the newer products (like "Zero") rather than the other way around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it is over-thinking&#8230;. but maybe it&#8217;s just an attempt to change imagery that was so strong to begin with. Or perhaps in the case of Tropicana, imagery that everyone was so accustom to. I think people would have rejected change in this case regardless of how good it was, or was not. Reminds me of when Coca-Cola tried to mess around with its logo several times&#8230;even calling it just &#8220;Coke&#8221;, instead of Cola-Cola. I believe the new branding was scrapped just b/c the old one was so strong. Now the &#8220;Coca-cola&#8221; classic logo is embedded into the newer products (like &#8220;Zero&#8221;) rather than the other way around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

